yourmumsdomain.com

Zim Zum wrote:

Villa wrote: Our submarines mainly operate out of bases such as Faslane, which is also home to our nuclear deterent subs (The Vanguard class subs).
quote]

Indeed, all 3 of them.

Vanguard, Vengeance, Victorious, Valiant

Whoops 1 short

Was a long time since I was in the RNR.

Tony Blair and George Bush are my heros

K TKS

If you don't have anything decent to say, then fuck off back to drachwhine where I swear my IQ drops by 10 every time I read it. If I read it anymore I'll be in the negative scale :/

At least post something debatable.

I take it you are liberal? Must have hit a nerve on that one....

I believe the US definition of Liberal isn't quite the same as the British equivalent.

Franklin OMG wrote:I take it you are liberal? Must have hit a nerve on that one....

Not particullary but theres a time and a place for posting shit.

As Villa said, I think there is a difference between American Liberals and British

Problem for Americans (One of Many) is that their election tends to be a two horse race - always; everytime.
You either vote for the party that wants to piss off the rest of the world, or you vote for the party that wants to piss on the rest of the world.

Whereas the british one is a two horse race about who can fuck up the country less.

I was reading Michael Howard's anti social disorder pledges the other day.
I like his plans to curb the so called 'Yob Culture' by being a bit harsher on young thugs.
I would have preferred a policy whereby all teenagers are sent to Siberia until they are old enough to be useful to the country, but failing that the current Conservative plan sounds better than whhat the other parties have to offer.

Also, I am firm believer in National Service, but I don't think the main parties will want to touch that issue with a barge pole.

I am tempted to vote Conservative again.

Villa wrote:Also, I am firm believer in National Service, but I don't think the main parties will want to touch that issue with a barge pole.

If only. Unfortunately there's far too many lazy fucks whose votes they'd lose for them to even consider it.

i can't vote yet but personally i'd say leave labour where they are....Tony Blair whilst being an utter prick may be able to turn some stuff around. why uproot the country to put another loser who will probably reverse all the good stuff blair has done and fk even more stuff up?

blue wrote:i can't vote yet but personally i'd say leave labour where they are....Tony Blair whilst being an utter prick may be able to turn some stuff around. why uproot the country to put another loser who will probably reverse all the good stuff blair has done and fk even more stuff up?

Unfortunately, Super Blair has done more for foreign countries than for his own (Or that's the way it looks at times).
During the Afghan and Iraq invasions, Super Blair did more to bolster support for Dubya than the average Republican party member...
Whenever Dubya's popularity rating is dropping, Super Blair miraculously appears alongside him to lend his support.
Super Blair is interested in sorting out issues in foreign countries - propping up a puppet regime in Iraq and Afghanistan with British Taxpayers money whilst our Hospitals suffer at home and violent crime goes unpunished.
Super Blair wants to spend British Taxpayer's money on foreign countries.

When you go to countries like Scandanavia, Austria, and certain other European countries you think, wow these are nice people, but very weird. Then you realise it's because they did national service. It scars you for life, noone should ever be forced to do something they don't want to.

Better that than the yob/charva/ned culture we have now :/